Toolformer taught a language model to call tools. Which weak spots of LMs did that target?
Arithmetic and factual lookup, where tiny tools beat huge models.
- Writing poems and stories
- Translating common sentences
- Arithmetic and looking up facts ✔
Why: Big language models struggle with exact math and fresh facts, while a calculator or search engine nails them. Toolformer learned when to call APIs like a calculator, search and a calendar, and how to use the results.
Huh, didn't know that: Toolformer learned tool use in a self-supervised way from just a handful of demonstrations per API.
Even a giant AI needs a calculator. I feel so much better about my math now.
References
Answer: Arithmetic and looking up facts. Big language models struggle with exact math and fresh facts, while a calculator or search engine nails them. Toolformer learned when to call APIs like a calculator, search and a calendar, and how to use the results.
- Schick et al., Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools (arXiv 2302.04761) arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761
They also, paradoxically, struggle with basic functionality, such as arithmetic or factual lookup, where much simpler and smaller models excel.
Checked 2026-10-10.
Think this answer is wrong? Tap "Challenge this answer" on the card in the game and tell us why.
More stuff everyone should know
That's stuff everyone should know.